The Library
FRONTIERS ORGPSYCH · Employee Engagement

The factors associated with workforce attrition and intention-to-leave among healthcare workers in New Zealand: a systematic literature review and meta-synthesis of qualitative research

Not yet classifiedby Sarah StewartSeptember 3, 2026 44 min read
healthcare workforce attrition intention-to-leave new zealand qualitative synthesis nursing organizational culture wellbeing māori health workforce retention

Editorial summary. This is our text summary of an article published by frontiers-orgpsych. Charts, figures, and the author’s full voice are at the original — read it there .

Editorial verdict

Methodologically sound qualitative synthesis with important limitations — the seven-theme model is credible and internally consistent, but the near-total exclusion of Māori and Pacific disaggregated data is a significant gap that constrains the study's applicability to the very populations most at risk in the NZ health system.

Executive summary

This article addresses the understudied problem of healthcare workforce attrition and intention-to-leave in Aotearoa New Zealand (NZ), where no prior qualitative synthesis had been conducted despite growing workforce instability. The authors conducted a systematic literature review and meta-synthesis of 20 qualitative and mixed-methods studies, guided by the ENTREQ checklist and a realist epistemological framework. Through content analysis informed by Braun and Clarke's thematic approach and Thomas and Harden's thematic synthesis method, seven interrelated themes were identified: high workloads, unsupportive organizational culture, limited career advancement opportunities, inadequate remuneration, declining professional identity, negative wellbeing impacts, and work-life imbalance. These themes span organizational, professional, and personal levels, with organizational pressures frequently acting as upstream drivers that cascade into professional and personal strain. The authors conclude that attrition and intention-to-leave represent cumulative, self-protective responses rather than individual failures, and that single-level interventions are unlikely to be effective. Key limitations include heterogeneous study quality, underrepresentation of many HPCAA-regulated professions, and the inability to disaggregate findings by ethnicity, particularly for Māori and Pacific health professionals.

researchRelevance: 8/10Asia-Pacific

Key insights

  • 1Attrition and intention-to-leave among NZ healthcare workers are driven by seven interrelated themes spanning organizational, professional, and personal levels, with organizational pressures commonly acting as the initiating mechanism that cascades into professional and personal harm.
  • 2High, unmanageable workloads were the most pervasive factor, reported across 18 of 20 studies, and were attributed to rising patient complexity, chronic staff shortages, administrative burden, and insufficient resourcing rather than individual capacity failures.
  • 3Despite Māori and Pacific participants being represented in 12 of 20 studies, qualitative findings were rarely disaggregated by ethnicity, leaving culturally specific drivers of workforce withdrawal — including institutional racism, cultural loading, and inequitable career pathways — largely unexamined within the available evidence base.

Practical takeaways

  • Organizations with high turnover among healthcare workers may find that addressing only remuneration or workload in isolation is insufficient, as the evidence points to cumulative, interacting pressures across organizational culture, career development, wellbeing, and work-life balance operating simultaneously.
  • Workforce monitoring systems that fail to disaggregate data by profession, ethnicity, and region will likely miss the distinct experiences of underrepresented groups — including Māori and Pacific health professionals — whose attrition drivers may differ materially from the dominant themes identified in this synthesis.

Frameworks mentioned

Job Demands-Resources (JD-R) Model

A theoretical framework used interpretively in the discussion to explain how imbalances between job demands and organizational resources contribute to burnout, disengagement, and workforce withdrawal among NZ health professionals.

Social Identity Theory

Applied in the discussion to explain how organizational conditions that undermine clinicians' sense of belonging, value, and alignment with professional values contribute to professional identity decline and subsequent workforce exit.

References

  1. Te Whatu Ora — Health New Zealand (2023).Health Workforce Plan 2023/24.
  2. OECD Publishing (2021).Health at a Glance 2021: OECD Indicators.
  3. Medical Council of New Zealand (2024).The New Zealand Medical Workforce in 2024.
  4. Pharmaceutical Society of New Zealand (2024).Pharmacy Workforce Survey 2024.
  5. Psychology Workforce Task Group (2017).Retaining the Psychology Workforce.
  6. Occupational Therapy Board of New Zealand / BERL (2018).Making Sense of the Numbers: The Occupational Therapist Workforce.
  7. New Zealand Nurses Organisation (2017).NZNO Employment Survey 2017.
  8. Association of Salaried Medical Specialists (2022).Over the Edge.
  9. Deloitte (2024).Health NZ Financial Management Review 2024.
  10. APEX (2014).Anatomical Pathology Scientific and Technical Workforce Situation Analysis.
  11. Ministry of Health (NZ) (2025).Te Awa Tārai — A Career Development Guide For Allied Health.
  12. BMC Medical Research Methodology (2008).Methods for thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews.
  13. BMC Medical Research Methodology (2012).Enhancing Transparency in Reporting the Synthesis of Qualitative Research (ENTREQ).
  14. Journal of Applied Psychology (2001).The job demands-resources model of burnout.

Source & Provenance

Verified
Publisher / Source

frontiers-orgpsych

Author

Sarah Stewart

Publication Date

September 3, 2026

Article Type

Meta-Analysis/Review

Geography

Asia-Pacific

Content Type
Unknown Source Type
Original Source

Original source metadata is preserved. AI analysis is generated separately.

Like this? Get the Monday Decision Brief — free, every week.

No spam, unsubscribe anytime.

Rate this article

Want the full article? Read it at the original source — free, no paywall.

Read original article
All content belongs to original publishers. AI analysis is for research purposes only. View original source.