Performance appraisal interval and employees' proactive working behavior

Editorial verdict

Methodologically sound empirical study with a novel temporal framing contribution, but geographic and industry concentration in Chinese high-tech firms limits generalizability — the inverted U-shape finding is credible, the boundary conditions warrant replication in broader contexts.

Executive summary

This study addresses a gap in performance appraisal research by examining how performance appraisal interval (PAI) — the time between successive appraisals — influences employees' proactive work behavior (PWB). The authors argue that PAI exerts dual opposing effects: a time-gain effect, whereby longer intervals increase delay of gratification (DG) and indirectly promote PWB, and a time-loss effect, whereby longer intervals amplify perceived uncertainty (PU) and indirectly suppress PWB. Drawing on psychological momentum (PM) theory and the additive benefit-and-cost principle proposed by Haans et al. (2016), the authors hypothesize an overall inverted U-shaped relationship between PAI and PWB, moderated by supervisor developmental feedback (SDF). A cross-level analysis of 622 employees across 57 teams in high-tech enterprises in Shanghai supported all six hypotheses: PAI had a positive but marginally decreasing effect on DG, a positive and marginally increasing effect on PU, and an overall inverted U-shaped effect on PWB. Higher SDF flattened the inverted U-shape, attenuating the negative consequences of extended PAI. The study concludes that a moderate PAI optimizes proactive behavior, and that developmental feedback functions as a compensatory leadership mechanism.

Frameworks mentioned

References

1. Strategic Management Journal (2016).Thinking about U: theorizing and testing U- and inverted U-shaped relationships in strategy research.
2. Review of General Psychology (2014).Psychological momentum: why success breeds success.
3. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior (2015).Time in individual-level organizational studies: what is it, how is it used, and why isn't it exploited more often?.
4. Journal of Applied Psychology (2017).Performance appraisal and performance management: 100 years of progress?.
5. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior (2019).When is proactivity wise? A review of factors that influence the individual outcomes of proactive behavior.
6. Journal of Applied Psychology (2006).Modeling the antecedents of proactive behavior at work.
7. Journal of Applied Psychology (2003).When the presence of creative coworkers is related to creativity: role of supervisor close monitoring, developmental feedback, and creative personality.
8. Perspectives on Psychological Science (2011).Too much of a good thing: the challenge and opportunity of the inverted U.
9. Journal of Business and Psychology (2004).Uncertainty during organizational change: types, consequences, and management strategies.
10. Journal of Management (2005).The roles of personality and self-defeating behaviors in self-management failure.
11. Sage (2018).Performance Appraisal and Management: Why Does It Fail and How Can It Be Fixed?.
12. Acta Psychologica Sinica (2007).The influence of organizational career management on occupational promise and job satisfaction: vocational delay of gratification as a mediator.
13. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics (2010).With or without U? The appropriate test for a U-shaped relationship.
14. Psychological Bulletin (1996).The effects of feedback interventions on performance: a historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory.
15. Psychological Methods (2007).Methods for integrating moderation and mediation: a general analytical framework using moderated path analysis.
16. Social and Personality Psychology Compass (2018).Psychological momentum: the phenomenology of goal pursuit.
17. Journal of Consumer Research (2014).The categorization of time and its impact on task initiation.
18. Journal of Applied Psychology (2012).Future work selves: how salient hoped-for identities motivate proactive career behaviors.
19. Journal of Applied Psychology (2011).The role of organizational insiders' developmental feedback and proactive personality on newcomers' performance: an interactionist perspective.
20. Chinese Journal of Management (2013).An empirical study on the relationship between pay for performance and team members' innovation behavior.