Editorial summary. This is our text summary of an article published by frontiers-orgpsych. Charts, figures, and the author’s full voice are at the original — read it there .
Licence. The original is licensed under CC BY 4.0. This page adapts it: the summary and analysis are ours, not the authors’.
Editorial verdict
Theoretical and programmatic: the OHAI framework sets out how collective intelligence in persistent human-AI teams could be studied, but the authors state that direct evidence from such teams 'remains limited' and the paper reports no data of its own; treat as a research agenda, not an actionable finding.
Executive summary
This article addresses the theoretical gap created by AI systems increasingly participating as recurrent, interdependent contributors to organizational work, arguing that existing research remains fragmented across system capabilities, individual responses, episodic interactions, and constructs derived from human-only teams. The authors propose the Organismic Human-Artificial Intelligence (OHAI) framework, positioning the 'persistent organizational human-AI team' — a bounded collective whose prior collective activity can affect later artificial participation — as the appropriate unit of analysis. The framework distinguishes three analytical objects: system configuration (pre-specifiable features of the hybrid system), collective functioning (the realized organization and use of distributed contributions), and collective intelligence (a general group-level capacity manifested across diverse tasks within a qualified task universe). Three selective lenses on collective functioning are introduced: theory-of-mind-related partner modeling, transactive memory system-related coordination, and shared mental model-related representational alignment. The framework also introduces concepts of recursive updating, overlapping timescales, and collective intelligence trajectories to address history-sensitivity. A four-stage empirical program is outlined, its stages described as nonmandatory levels of research maturity rather than a compulsory sequence. The authors acknowledge that direct empirical evidence from persistent organizational human-AI teams is currently limited, and OHAI is explicitly theoretical and programmatic in character.
Key insights
- 1Component properties implemented in an artificial system do not by themselves establish corresponding team-level phenomena; collective functioning must be demonstrated through the enacted organization and use of distributed contributions.
- 2Persistence — defined as functional continuity whereby prior collective activity can affect later artificial participation — is a domain-defining condition distinguishing OHAI-relevant teams from one-shot or episodic human-AI interactions, and it makes collective history consequential through recursive updating and path dependence.
- 3Collective intelligence in human-AI teams is distinct from task-specific performance, coordination quality, informational synergy, and individual component capability; it requires estimation across a qualified, diverse universe of tasks and cannot be inferred from a single episode or the capabilities of any one contributor.
Practical takeaways
- Organizational governance of persistent human-AI teams extends beyond initial AI deployment, because retained interaction histories, source estimates, role representations, and routines can carry forward errors, obsolete representations, biased routing, or inappropriate reliance into future collective activity.
- Role-and-expertise maps, participative reviews, and longitudinal assessment profiles are proposed as instruments, still to be developed and evaluated, for examining how actual patterns of consultation, contribution, and verification compare with formal allocations, and how changes in collective capability distribute demands and recognition across human members.
Frameworks mentioned
Transactive Memory System (TMS)
A distributed cognitive architecture in which members combine differentiated individual knowledge with knowledge about where relevant expertise resides in the group, characterized through specialization, credibility, and coordination.
Shared Mental Models (SMM)
Shared or compatible knowledge structures held by team members concerning goals, roles, procedures, constraints, system states, and interdependencies, supporting anticipation and coordination.
Interactive Team Cognition
An approach treating coordinated interaction as the principal locus of team cognition, emphasizing that team-level phenomena must be established through enacted interaction rather than inferred from individual or component properties.
IMOI (Input-Mediator-Output-Input)
A recurrent team process model that treats team episodes as interdependent and history-sensitive, extending the earlier input-process-output tradition to capture feedback loops and recursive dynamics.
Job Demands-Resources (JD-R)
A framework examining how job demands and resources are associated with employee engagement and strain, applied here to assess how changes in collective capability may redistribute demands and resources among human members of hybrid teams.
9-Box Grid
Not mentioned in this article.
References
- Science (2010).Evidence for a collective intelligence factor in the performance of human groups.
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (2021).Quantifying collective intelligence in human groups.
- Cognitive Science (2013).Interactive team cognition.
- Academy of Management Review (2001).A temporally based framework and taxonomy of team processes.
- Annual Review of Psychology (2005).Teams in organizations: from input-process-output models to IMOI models.
- Journal of Applied Psychology (2010).The cognitive underpinnings of effective teamwork: a meta-analysis.
- Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science (2023).The role of shared mental models in human-AI teams: a theoretical review.
- Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting (2021).Articulating the role of artificial intelligence in collective intelligence: a transactive systems framework.
- Topics in Cognitive Science (2025).Self-beliefs, transactive memory systems, and collective identification in teams: articulating the socio-cognitive underpinnings of COHUMAIN.
- Frontiers in Psychology (2023).Human-AI teaming: leveraging transactive memory and speaking up for enhanced team effectiveness.
- Psychological Science in the Public Interest (2006).Enhancing the effectiveness of work groups and teams.
- Leadership Quarterly (2020).Leading teams in the digital age: four perspectives on technology and what they mean for leading teams.
- Ergonomics (2023).Designing human-AI systems for complex settings.
- Theories of Group Behavior (Springer) (1987).Transactive memory: a contemporary analysis of the group mind.
- Frontiers in Psychology (2017).Understanding and modeling teams as dynamical systems.
- Journal of Occupational Health Psychology (2017).Job demands-resources theory: taking stock and looking forward.
- Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (1985).Pooling of unshared information in group decision making: Biased information sampling during discussion.
- Journal of Business Research (2024).Integrating AI in organizations for value creation through human-AI teaming: a dynamic-capabilities approach.
- Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (2023).Collective intelligence in human-AI teams: a Bayesian theory of mind approach.
- British Journal of Anaesthesia (2008).Influence of transactive memory on perceived performance, job satisfaction and identification in anaesthesia teams.
- Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Research (2016).The mediating effect of team engagement between team cognitions and team outcomes in service-management teams.
- Frontiers in Organizational Psychology (2025).Integrating team and organizational identity: a systematic literature analysis.
- European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology (2015).Effects of guided reflexivity and team feedback on team performance improvement.
- International Journal of Intercultural Relations (1998).Process gain and process loss: comparing interpersonal processes and performance of culturally diverse and non-diverse teams across time.
- Proceedings of the 36th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (2023).Generative agents: Interactive simulacra of human behavior.
Source & Provenance
frontiers-orgpsych
Alessandro Rovetta, Alessandro Bortolotti, Claudio Di Berardino
October 8, 2026
Framework Proposal
Global
Original source metadata is preserved. AI analysis is generated separately.
Like this? Get the Monday Decision Brief — free, every week.
No spam, unsubscribe anytime.
Rate this article
Want the full article? Read it at the original source — free, no paywall.
Read original article