The Library
LEADERSHIP DEVELOPMENT

Why Leadership Development Feels Broken: And How We’re Fixing It - Josh Bersin

unknownJuly 7, 2019 15 min read
leadership development leadership pipeline coaching mentoring performance management talent development organisational design immersive learning succession planning

Editorial summary. This is our text summary of an article published by gnews-leadership-development. Charts, figures, and the author’s full voice are at the original — read it there .

Editorial verdict

Opinion-heavy practitioner commentary with selective vendor promotion — the conceptual framework on leadership development evolution is credible and well-grounded, but the article transitions into thinly veiled vendor endorsements that compromise its analytical credibility.

Executive summary

This article, authored by Josh Bersin, addresses what it characterises as a systemic failure in corporate leadership development — a market exceeding $14 billion annually yet producing persistent pipeline gaps. Bersin argues that the traditional 'Leadership Pipeline' model, built on hierarchical, stepwise progression and positional authority, is structurally misaligned with contemporary organisational realities characterised by flatter structures, cross-functional teams, and accelerated career timelines. The author's central argument is that leadership development must shift from long-form programmatic approaches to a more agile, experiential model organised around four dimensions: Education, Experience, Exposure, and Evaluation. Key evidence cited includes statistics on leadership bench strength (14% of companies report a strong bench), a DDI/EY study linking formal mentoring to 20% lower turnover and 46% higher leadership quality, and the author's personal professional observations. The article concludes by profiling several technology vendors — including BetterUp, STRIVR, Mursion, Glint, and others — as representative of a new generation of solutions addressing these gaps. The author discloses an advisory relationship with BetterUp, a material conflict of interest that affects the objectivity of vendor assessments.

opinionRelevance: 7/10Global

Key insights

  • 1Only 14% of companies report a strong leadership bench, and 64% identify developing next-generation leaders as their top talent challenge, suggesting systemic inadequacy in existing development models.
  • 2The traditional 'Leadership Pipeline' framework, premised on slow hierarchical progression and positional authority, is characterised as increasingly misaligned with organisations that are flatter, more agile, and where individual contributors hold significant influence.
  • 3A DDI/EY study cited in the article associates formal mentoring programmes with 20% lower turnover, 46% higher leadership quality scores, and roles filled 23% more quickly — positioning coaching and mentorship as high-leverage development interventions.

Practical takeaways

  • The 'Four E's' framework — Education, Experience, Exposure, and Evaluation — is presented as an organising structure for redesigning leadership development that moves beyond formal programmes toward continuous, on-the-job learning.
  • The article documents a shift among performance management platform vendors (Glint, BetterWorks, CultureAmp) toward 'action platforms' that embed real-time feedback and developmental nudges into daily workflows, representing an integration of performance management and leadership development.

Frameworks mentioned

Leadership Pipeline

A hierarchical leadership development model attributed to Ram Charan, describing five progressive leader types from Individual Contributor through Managing an Enterprise, each requiring distinct skill development.

9-Box Grid

A talent assessment tool used to separate current performance from future leadership potential, typically mapping employees on a grid used for succession planning and promotion readiness decisions.

360-Degree Review

A multi-source feedback methodology in which leaders receive performance and behavioural assessments from peers, direct reports, and managers, referenced here as a component of the Evaluation dimension.

References

  1. DDI / Ernst & Young (2019).DDI E-Y Research on Mentorship and Leadership Quality.

Source & Provenance

Verified
Publisher / Source

gnews-leadership-development

Author

Not specified

Publication Date

July 7, 2019

Article Type

Opinion/Commentary

Geography

Global

Content Type
Unknown Source Type
Original Source

Original source metadata is preserved. AI analysis is generated separately.

Like this? Get the Monday Decision Brief — free, every week.

No spam, unsubscribe anytime.

Rate this article

Want the full article? Read it at the original source — free, no paywall.

Read original article
All content belongs to original publishers. AI analysis is for research purposes only. View original source.