Editorial summary. This is our text summary of an article published by gnews-continuous-feedback. We reached this item through a news aggregator and do not have a verified link to the publisher’s own page, so there is nowhere reliable to send you for the full text.
Editorial verdict
Practitioner consensus piece. Three HR leaders agree that ratings need continuous feedback to remain relevant, but their hybrid approaches vary by organizational context. The perspectives are practical but lack empirical evidence.
Executive summary
This article examines whether traditional performance ratings remain relevant as organizations adopt continuous feedback models. Three senior HR executives from Reliance Infrastructure, Omega Healthcare, and Blue Dart share their perspectives on balancing structured ratings with ongoing feedback. Jaidip Chatterjee argues that ratings alone are outdated and must be complemented by continuous feedback from multiple stakeholders using modern HRMS platforms. Nitin Barekere advocates for segmented approaches, maintaining biannual evaluations for mature talent while implementing quarterly reviews for early-career employees. Beena Jacob emphasizes that ratings and feedback serve complementary purposes—ratings enable fairness and comparability for compensation decisions, while continuous feedback drives development. All three executives conclude that the solution lies not in choosing one system over another, but in creating hybrid models that combine structured ratings with ongoing feedback practices.
Key insights
- 1Performance ratings require continuous feedback to remain relevant in agile work environments
- 2Different employee segments may benefit from different performance management approaches
- 3Modern HRMS platforms enable real-time feedback capture from multiple stakeholders including peers and customers
Practical takeaways
- Organizations can implement segmented performance management systems with different evaluation frequencies for different employee groups
- Multi-stakeholder feedback through platforms can provide richer insights than manager-only evaluations
Frameworks mentioned
360-Degree Review
Multi-stakeholder feedback mechanism that captures insights from managers, peers, cross-functional teams and customers
Bell Curves
Traditional performance distribution method that forces employees into predetermined performance categories
Source & Provenance
gnews-continuous-feedback
Not specified
March 9, 2026
Opinion/Commentary
Asia-Pacific
Original source metadata is preserved. AI analysis is generated separately.
Like this? Get the Monday Decision Brief — free, every week.
No spam, unsubscribe anytime.