Enhancing mental toughness among healthcare leaders to support employee engagement

Editorial verdict

Hypothesis-generating pilot only. The within-person dose-response signal is internally consistent across multiple robustness checks, but N=12, no control group, and ~36% missing engagement data mean no causal claims are supportable — treat as a feasibility signal, not evidence of effect.

Executive summary

This article addresses whether participation in a structured mental toughness (MT) intervention is associated with improved employee engagement among senior healthcare leaders operating under persistent high-pressure conditions. The authors — Cavan and Stamatis — argue that MT represents a developable psychological resource that may complement traditional wellbeing and leadership development initiatives by strengthening leaders' capacity for attention, emotion, and behavior regulation under stress. The study enrolled 12 senior leaders from University of Louisville Health in a six-session, bi-weekly group intervention. Mental toughness was measured using the Mental Toughness Index (MTI) and engagement using the Employee Engagement Scale (EES) at each session. Key findings include an approximately 3-point increase in total engagement across sessions (standardized β ≈ +0.12 per session), a positive dose-response pattern whereby each additional prior session attended was associated with roughly +1.3 points higher within-person engagement change, and the strongest subscale improvement in behavioral engagement. The authors conclude that MT interventions may offer a scalable complement to stress-reduction approaches, while explicitly framing findings as exploratory and hypothesis-generating given the pilot design, small sample, and absence of a control group.

Frameworks mentioned

References

1. Behavioural Science & Policy (2019).Reducing the health toll from US workplace stress.
2. Journal of General Internal Medicine (2023).The association of work overload with burnout and intent to leave the job across the healthcare workforce during COVID-19.
3. Mayo Clinic Proceedings (2017).Executive leadership and physician well-being: nine organizational strategies to promote engagement and reduce burnout.
4. Journal of Personality (2015).The concept of mental toughness: tests of dimensionality, nomological network, and traitness.
5. Current Opinion in Psychology (2017).Mental toughness: progress and prospects.
6. Human Resource Management (2017).The employee engagement scale: initial evidence for construct validity and implications for theory and practice.
7. Academy of Management Journal (1990).Psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengagement at work.
8. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology (2004).The psychological conditions of meaningfulness, safety and availability and the engagement of the human spirit at work.
9. NSI Nursing Solutions Inc (2025).2025 National Health Care Retention & RN Staffing Report.
10. Journal of Psychiatric Research (2011).The role and interpretation of pilot studies in clinical research.
11. Administrative Sciences (2023).Effect of the employees' mental toughness on organizational commitment and job satisfaction: mediating psychological well-being.
12. JMIR Mental Health (2022).Brief digital interventions to support the psychological well-being of NHS staff during the COVID-19 pandemic: 3-arm pilot randomized controlled trial.
13. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (2020).Psychological interventions to foster resilience in healthcare professionals.
14. BMC Medical Research Methodology (2025).Reviewing methodological approaches to dose-response modelling in complex interventions: insights and perspectives.
15. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management (2023).Treatment effect estimates from pilot trials are unreliable.