Editorial summary. This is our text summary of an article published by PLOS ONE. Charts, figures, and the author’s full voice are at the original — read it there .
Editorial verdict
Credible foundational study. The organisational-level associations are statistically significant and methodologically sound, but causality cannot be established — the cross-sectional pooling, low response rates, and self-reported company data limit the strength of conclusions.
Executive summary
This study addresses a recognised gap in workplace mental health research: the organisational-level outcomes of line manager (LM) training in mental health, as opposed to the more commonly studied employee-level outcomes. The authors argue that LM training in mental health carries strategic business value beyond individual wellbeing improvements. Using secondary analysis of anonymised panel survey data from 7,139 firms in England across four waves (2020–2023), the study employed probit regression controlling for organisation age, sector, size, and survey wave. Results indicate that LM training in mental health is significantly associated with improved staff recruitment (β = .317, p < .001), staff retention (β = .453, p < .001), customer service (β = .453, p < .001), business performance (β = .349, p < .001), and reduced long-term sickness absence due to mental ill-health (β = -.132, p < .05). No significant associations were observed for three other sickness absence indicators. The authors conclude that this constitutes the first large-scale, multi-sector, company-level evidence base linking LM mental health training to diverse organisational performance outcomes, with implications for policy and practice internationally.
Key insights
- 1LM training in mental health is significantly associated with five organisational-level outcomes: staff recruitment, staff retention, customer service, business performance, and reduced long-term sickness absence due to mental ill-health — but not with the overall presence, proportion, or recurrence of sickness absence.
- 2The study is the first to examine these associations using company-level (rather than self-reported employee-level) data across a diverse range of organisations by size, sector, and age in England, covering over 7,000 firm observations across four annual waves.
- 3The authors observe a nuanced picture on sickness absence: LM training appears linked to reducing long-term cases but not to broader absence indicators, suggesting that the prevention-orientation versus remedial-orientation of training content may be a critical differentiating variable not captured in this dataset.
Practical takeaways
- Organisations that provide LM training in mental health report better outcomes across multiple business performance dimensions, including recruitment, retention, customer service, and reduced long-term absence — a pattern consistent across sectors and organisation sizes in the English context.
- The nature, content, focus, and duration of LM training — not merely its presence or absence — is identified as an important variable for future research to examine in relation to differential organisational outcomes.
Frameworks mentioned
IGLO Model
A framework identifying four targeted areas of behavioural and organisational change for promoting mental health at work: Individual, Group, Leader/manager, and Organisation levels.
Job Demands-Resources (JD-R) Model
A theoretical model positing that work characteristics (job demands and job resources) influence employee psychological well-being and work engagement via health impairment and motivational pathways, with downstream effects on organisational outcomes.
Chain of Impact Model
A framework by Tamkin (2005) theorising that workforce activities (attendance, effort, quality, innovation) drive organisational outputs (productivity, business performance, customer satisfaction), which in turn drive economic outcomes.
References
- Deloitte (2022).Poor mental health costs UK employers up to £56 billion a year.
- Work & Stress (2018).IGLOO: An integrated framework for sustainable return to work in workers with common mental disorders.
- Journal of Managerial Psychology (2007).The job demands-resources model: State of the art.
- Work & Stress (2019).The job demands-resources model: A meta-analytic review of longitudinal studies.
- World Health Organization (2022).Guidelines on mental health at work.
- Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (2023).Mental Health First Aid as a tool for improving mental health and well-being.
- Occupational Medicine (2024).Typology of employers offering line manager training for mental health.
- Occupational and Environmental Medicine (2018).Effectiveness of training workplace managers to understand and support the mental health needs of employees: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
- The Lancet Psychiatry (2017).Workplace mental health training for managers and its effect on sick leave in employees: a cluster randomised controlled trial.
- DfES publication RW39 (2005).The Contribution of Skills to Business Performance.
- Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health (2023).How effective are organizational-level interventions in improving the psychosocial work environment, health, and retention of workers? A systematic overview of systematic reviews.
- Perspectives in Public Health (2023).Training for line managers should focus on primary prevention of mental ill-health at work.
- JMIR Research Protocols (2023).Digital Training Program for Line Managers (Managing Minds at Work): Protocol for a Feasibility Pilot Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial.
Source & Provenance
PLOS ONE
Hassard et al.
Not specified
Research Study
Europe
Original source metadata is preserved. AI analysis is generated separately.
Like this? Get the Monday Decision Brief — free, every week.
No spam, unsubscribe anytime.
Rate this article
Want the full article? Read it at the original source — free, no paywall.
Read original article