External source record
Leadership Training Programs for Managers
- Publisher
- —
- Published
- 28 February 2025
- Source status
- Publisher not verified
Publisher not yet verified
We reached this article through an aggregator and have not yet confirmed who published it. This describes our records, not the quality of the source.
Peoplense analysis
Peoplense's own analysis of this source, not the publisher's text. It was generated by machine from the source article and has not yet been read by one of our editors. Treat it as a starting point and check the original.
Peoplense verdict
Vendor directory disguised as guidance. The article lists training providers without critical evaluation or evidence of effectiveness. Use as a starting point for options, not as quality assessment.
Summary
This article addresses the challenge of selecting appropriate leadership training programs for managers, noting that 83% of organizations anticipate needing new leadership skills according to DDI's 2025 Global Leadership Forecast. The author presents a directory-style overview of various leadership training providers, including American Management Association, Babson College, EdX, Center for Creative Leadership, Dale Carnegie, Harvard, LinkedIn Learning, Manager Bootcamp, Udemy, and Thomas Gordon programs. The article provides basic program descriptions, formats, costs, and contact information for each option. It also discusses considerations for creating in-house leadership programs and measuring ROI, concluding that organizations should assess training relevance, knowledge application, and business impact when evaluating program effectiveness.
Strengths and limitations
Strengths include comprehensive coverage of training options and practical ROI measurement considerations. Major limitations include lack of comparative analysis, absence of effectiveness evidence, and potential bias toward featured providers. The article functions more as a vendor directory than critical evaluation, with no independent research on program outcomes or quality comparisons.
What this implies
The findings suggest organizations face a dual challenge of anticipating new leadership skill requirements while addressing current training gaps in critical areas like change management and decision-making, potentially driving increased investment in both external and internal leadership development programs
Key points
- 83% of organizations anticipate needing new leadership skills, yet many lack training in change management, talent development, and decision-making
- Effective leadership training requires research-based programs supporting 'learning by doing' with feedback and self-assessment opportunities
- In-house leadership programs can develop leaders with existing organizational knowledge and relationships
What to take away
- Evaluate leadership training programs based on cost, relevance, structure, and curriculum alignment with organizational goals
- Measure training ROI by assessing participant relevance perceptions, knowledge application, and business impact