The Library
SPRINGER · Performance Management

Leader autonomy support in the workplace: A meta-analytic review

Not yet classifiedby Gavin R. Slemp, Margaret L. Kern, Kent J. Patrick, Richard M. RyanMay 17, 2018 51 min read
leadership autonomy support self-determination theory employee motivation well-being meta-analysis psychological needs work engagement performance management organizational behavior

Editorial summary. This is our text summary of an article published by springer. Charts, figures, and the author’s full voice are at the original — read it there .

Licence. The original is licensed under CC BY 4.0. This page adapts it: the summary and analysis are ours, not the authors’.

Editorial verdict

Landmark meta-analysis. The core SDT-LAS findings are robust across 72 studies and 32,870 participants, with consistent effect sizes and minimal publication bias — the motivational pathway model holds, though the predominantly cross-sectional evidence base and self-report reliance warrant caution on causal claims.

Executive summary

This meta-analysis examines the associations between perceived leader autonomy support (LAS) — supervisory behaviors that promote employee self-determination — and a broad range of employee outcomes in organizational settings. Drawing on self-determination theory (SDT), the authors hypothesize that LAS will correlate positively with internalized forms of work motivation, basic psychological need satisfaction, well-being, and positive work behaviors, while correlating negatively with distress and amotivation. Analysing 754 correlations across 72 studies (83 unique samples, N = 32,870), the meta-analysis finds that LAS shows a progressively stronger positive correlation with increasingly internalized motivational forms, from near-zero associations with external regulation to strong associations with intrinsic motivation (ρ = .38). LAS correlates strongly with need satisfaction (autonomy: ρ = .57), well-being (ρ = .46), job satisfaction (ρ = .56), and negatively with distress (ρ = −.33) and turnover intentions (ρ = −.40). Moderator analyses reveal no significant effects of leader proximity, cultural individualism-collectivism, publication status, or measurement operationalization. A meta-analytic path analysis confirms that basic need satisfaction and autonomous motivation mediate the relationship between LAS and employee outcomes, providing empirical support for the full SDT organizational model.

researchRelevance: 8/10Global

Key insights

  • 1LAS shows a pattern of increasingly strong positive correlations with more internalized forms of motivation as described by SDT — strongest with intrinsic motivation (ρ = .38), near-zero with external regulation (ρ = .00), and moderately negative with amotivation (ρ = −.31).
  • 2LAS is most strongly associated with the need for autonomy (ρ = .57), followed by relatedness (ρ = .46) and competence (ρ = .42), and these need satisfactions mediate the pathway from LAS to well-being and positive work outcomes.
  • 3The effects of LAS appear culturally universal — no significant moderation was found when comparing individualist versus collectivist country samples — and are not contingent on whether support comes from proximal or more distal leaders.

Practical takeaways

  • Organizations seeking to improve employee well-being, engagement, job satisfaction, and reduce turnover intentions may find that developing autonomy-supportive supervisory behaviors represents a coherent, theoretically grounded lever — though causal evidence from intervention studies remains limited and should be developed further.
  • The LAS–work performance association is moderated by measurement type (self-report: ρ = .35 vs. other-report/objective: ρ = .15), indicating that organisations measuring performance impact of leadership development programmes through self-report data alone risk overstating effects.

Frameworks mentioned

Self-Determination Theory (SDT)

A broad theory of human motivation distinguishing autonomous from controlled motivation, and identifying three basic psychological needs — autonomy, competence, and relatedness — whose satisfaction is theorized to predict internalization of motivation, well-being, and optimal functioning.

Organismic Integration Theory

A sub-theory within SDT describing the continuum of internalization from external regulation through introjected, identified, and integrated regulation to intrinsic motivation, used here to frame expected differential associations with LAS.

References

  1. Ryan and Deci (2000).Self-determination and intrinsic motivation in human behavior.
  2. Ryan and Deci (2017).Self-Determination Theory: Basic Psychological Needs in Motivation, Development, and Wellness.
  3. Baard, Deci, and Ryan (2004).Work Climate Questionnaire.
  4. Moreau and Mageau (2012).Perceived Autonomy Support Scale for Employees.
  5. Deci et al. (1989).Work Climate Scale.
  6. Gagné et al. (2015).Multidimensional Work Motivation Scale (MWMS).
  7. Schaufeli et al. (2006).Utrecht Work Engagement Scale (UWES).
  8. Van den Broeck et al. (2016).Basic psychological needs in the work domain: A meta-analysis.
  9. Taylor (1911).The Principles of Scientific Management.
  10. Schmidt and Hunter (2015).Methods of Research in Meta-Analysis.

Source & Provenance

Verified
Publisher / Source

springer

Author

Gavin R. Slemp, Margaret L. Kern, Kent J. Patrick, Richard M. Ryan

Publication Date

May 17, 2018

Article Type

Meta-Analysis/Review

Geography

Global

Content Type
Unknown Source Type
Original Source

Original source metadata is preserved. AI analysis is generated separately.

Like this? Get the Monday Decision Brief — free, every week.

No spam, unsubscribe anytime.

Rate this article

Want the full article? Read it at the original source — free, no paywall.

Read original article
All content belongs to original publishers. AI analysis is for research purposes only. View original source