Editorial summary. This is our text summary of an article published by plos. Charts, figures, and the author’s full voice are at the original — read it there .
Editorial verdict
Methodologically rigorous. The core finding — that pay dispersion definition drives contradictory results — is a genuine contribution, but the sports-to-workplace generalizability and unresolved skill-dispersion confound limit direct application to organizational PMS.
Executive summary
This peer-reviewed study, published in PLoS ONE (2014) by Bucciol, Foss, and Piovesan, addresses the longstanding contradictory findings in pay dispersion research by examining how the definition of 'team' affects measured outcomes. Using two seasons (2009–2011) of Italian Serie A soccer data across 666 matches and 925 players, the authors demonstrate that the same dataset produces positive, null, or negative relationships between pay dispersion and team performance depending on how team membership is operationalized. When only active team members (weighted by minutes played) are considered, higher pay dispersion is associated with a statistically significant reduction in winning probability (doubling pay dispersion reduces win probability by approximately 6%). This negative effect disappears when substitute players are included and reverses to positive when the full team roster is used. The mechanism appears to operate through degraded individual performance rather than reduced cooperation, as measured by subjective individual performance assessments from three Italian sports newspapers. The authors acknowledge an unresolved confound: pay dispersion may proxy for skill dispersion, making causal attribution uncertain.
Key insights
- 1The definition of 'team' — whether restricted to active contributors or expanded to the full roster — is the primary driver of whether pay dispersion shows a positive, null, or negative effect on performance, which may explain decades of contradictory findings in the literature.
- 2When team membership is defined precisely (active players weighted by minutes played), pay dispersion has a measurable negative impact on team performance; doubling the Theil index reduces the probability of winning by approximately 6%, falling from 0.56 to 0.24 at maximum observed dispersion.
- 3Pay dispersion's detrimental effect appears to operate through reduced individual performance rather than reduced cooperation: individual subjective performance assessments decline with higher pay dispersion, while the number of passes (a cooperation proxy) shows no significant relationship with pay dispersion.
Practical takeaways
- Organizations and researchers measuring the effect of pay dispersion on team outcomes may reach opposing conclusions depending on whether they include all enrolled members or only those who actively contributed to the task — suggesting that precision in team boundary definition is a critical methodological variable.
- The numerical examples in the study illustrate that concentrating pay in one high earner while compressing pay for the remainder produces worse aggregate individual performance than a more equalized distribution at the same total payroll cost, though this conclusion carries the caveat of the unresolved skill-dispersion confound.
References
- Jossey-Bass (1990).Strategic pay: Aligning organizational strategies and pay systems.
- Strategic Management Journal (2002).Pay dispersion and workforce performance: Moderating effects of incentives and interdependence.
- Irwin (1996).Compensation (5th ed.).
- Kyklos (2007).Intra-firm wage dispersion and firm performance – Is there a uniform relationship?.
- Academy of Management Journal (2012).Reconsidering pay dispersion's effect on the performance of interdependent work: Reconciling sorting and pay inequality.
- Research in Organizational Behavior (1981).Relative deprivation: A theory of distributive injustice for an era of shrinking resources.
- The Journal of Political Economy (1981).Rank-order tournaments as optimum labor contracts.
- Economica (1991).Efficiency pays and pays dispersion.
- Journal of Business Research (2010).Legitimacy of team rewards: Analyzing legitimacy as a condition for the effectiveness of a team incentive designs.
- Prentice Hall (1992).Economics, organization, and management.
- Atlantic Economic Journal (2007).Work incentives and salary distributions in Major League Baseball.
- Atlantic Economic Journal (2004).Pay inequality and firm performance: Professional basketball's natural experiment.
- Applied Economics (2011).A game-level analysis of salary dispersion and team performance in the National Basketball Association.
- Journal of Economic Perspectives (2007).Personnel economics: the economist's view of human resources.
- Journal of Management (2006).A meta-analytic review of relationships between team design features and team performance.
- Personnel Psychology (2008).A meta-analysis of teamwork processes: Tests of a multidimensional model and relationships with team effectiveness criteria.
- Journal of Management (2013).Advancing our understanding of Team motivation – Integrating conceptual approaches and content areas.
- Journal of Political Economy (2003).Team incentives and worker heterogeneity: An empirical analysis of the impact of teams on productivity and participation.
- Annual Review of Psychology (1996).Teams in organizations: Recent research on performance and effectiveness.
- Organization Science (1997).The disaggregation of corporations: Selective intervention, high-powered incentives, and molecular units.
- Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, Microeconomics (1991).Wage dispersion between and within U.S. manufacturing plants.
- Strategic Management Journal (2010).Sharing the wealth: social comparisons and pay dispersion in the CEO's top team.
- Academy of Management Journal (1999).The performance effects of pay dispersion on individuals and organizations.
- Administrative Science Quarterly (1992).The incentive effects of tournament compensation systems.
- The Journal of Political Economy (1990).Do tournaments have incentive effects?.
- Maxwell School of Citizenship and Public Affairs, Syracuse University (2006).Salary distribution and performance: Evidence from the National Hockey League.
- Economics Letters (2000).Pay disparity and team productivity: Evidence from Major League Baseball.
- Economics Letters (2010).Raising salary or redistributing it: A panel analysis of major league baseball.
- Economics Bulletin (2003).Team payroll and team performance in Major League Baseball: 1985–2002.
- Administrative Science Quarterly (1993).The effect of wage dispersion on satisfaction, productivity, and working collaboratively: Evidence from college and university faculty.
- Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited (2011).Annual review of football finance 2011.
- Journal of Economic Perspectives (2000).The sports business as a labor market laboratory.
- The American Economic Review (1974).Pay and performance in Major League Baseball.
Source & Provenance
plos
Alessandro Bucciol, Nicolai J. Foss, Marco Piovesan
November 12, 2014
Research Study
Europe
Original source metadata is preserved. AI analysis is generated separately.
Like this? Get the Monday Decision Brief — free, every week.
No spam, unsubscribe anytime.
Rate this article
Want the full article? Read it at the original source — free, no paywall.
Read original article