The Library
EMPLOYEE ENGAGEMENT BROAD

Employee Experience: What It Is and How to Improve It - Built In

unknownDecember 22, 2022 6 min read
employee experience employee engagement workplace flexibility talent retention hr strategy workplace technology manager effectiveness

Editorial summary. This is our text summary of an article published by gnews-employee-engagement-broad. Charts, figures, and the author’s full voice are at the original — read it there .

Editorial verdict

Practitioner-facing overview with limited methodological rigour — the statistics cited are selectively sourced and the advice is generalised; useful as a orientation piece but not as an evidence base for strategic decisions.

Executive summary

This article, published by Built In, addresses the concept of employee experience (EX) as a comprehensive construct encompassing every interaction an employee has with an organisation across the full employment lifecycle. The author argues that employee experience is a critical driver of engagement, retention, and organisational performance, and that it requires individualised attention from managers rather than aggregate workforce assessments. Key evidence includes a 2024 SHRM finding that employees with positive EX are 68 percent less likely to consider leaving, alongside statistics from Forbes and Paycom on technology dissatisfaction and from CNBC on mentorship satisfaction. The article identifies three primary inhibitors of positive EX — poor physical workspaces, outdated technology, and inflexible work arrangements — and outlines four organisational strategies for improvement: data collection, transparency, employee development investment, and skills-aligned task design. The article concludes that improving EX requires moving from standardised, company-centric policies toward individually tailored, human-centred approaches to work design and leadership.

guideRelevance: 6/10United States

Key insights

  • 1Employees with a positive employee experience are 68 percent less likely to consider leaving their jobs, according to 2024 SHRM research.
  • 2Nearly 80 percent of employees report frustration with outdated workplace technology, and nearly 70 percent would accept a pay cut for significantly better tools, according to Paycom data.
  • 3Employee experience is ranked as the first or second highest priority by 46 percent of HR professionals and 36 percent of U.S. workers, indicating broad but unevenly distributed institutional attention to the construct.

Practical takeaways

  • Organisations that deploy employee sentiment surveys and open forums as structured feedback mechanisms generate data that can inform targeted EX improvements at the team level.
  • Managers who adopt coaching and mentoring postures — rather than limiting engagement to periodic performance reviews — are associated with higher employee satisfaction, with over 90 percent of mentored workers reporting job satisfaction per a CNBC survey.

Frameworks mentioned

360-Degree Review

Referenced as an example of a traditional performance management practice that the article suggests is insufficient on its own for meeting modern employee experience expectations.

References

  1. Society for Human Resource Management (SHRM) (2024).2024 SHRM Employee Experience Research.
  2. Forbes0. Employee Technology Dissatisfaction Survey.
  3. Paycom0. Employee Technology Frustration Data.
  4. CNBC0. Mentorship and Job Satisfaction Survey.

Source & Provenance

Verified
Publisher / Source

gnews-employee-engagement-broad

Author

Not specified

Publication Date

December 22, 2022

Article Type

Practitioner Guide

Geography

United States

Content Type
Unknown Source Type
Original Source

Original source metadata is preserved. AI analysis is generated separately.

Like this? Get the Monday Decision Brief — free, every week.

No spam, unsubscribe anytime.

Rate this article

Want the full article? Read it at the original source — free, no paywall.

Read original article
All content belongs to original publishers. AI analysis is for research purposes only. View original source.