External source record
The 3 C’s of trust: Connection, Character and Competence
- Publisher
- —
- Author
- Ravi Rajani
- Published
- 13 April 2026
- Source status
- Publisher not verified
Not yet classified
This source has not been categorised yet.
Peoplense analysis
Peoplense's own analysis of this source, not the publisher's text. It was generated by machine from the source article and has not yet been read by one of our editors. Treat it as a starting point and check the original.
Peoplense verdict
Practitioner-driven framework. The 3 C's model is intuitive and well-articulated, but lacks empirical validation. The relationship-building techniques are sound — use the methods, but don't expect scientific backing.
Summary
The article addresses trust-building challenges in professional relationships, citing data showing 61% of people worry business leaders deliberately mislead. The author proposes a '3 C's of Trust' framework comprising Connection (emotional bonds through stories, questions, listening), Character (visible values in communication), and Competence (perceived expertise and credibility). The framework suggests all three elements must work together for lasting relationships, as relying on only one or two creates vulnerabilities. The author presents a 'What-Feel-Who Method' for establishing connection through conscious questioning that uncovers what matters to others, how they feel about it, and who it impacts. The approach emphasizes showing care through follow-up questions that demonstrate genuine interest rather than surface-level interaction.
Strengths and limitations
Strengths include practical applicability and clear methodology. The author draws on the Edelman Trust Barometer for context. Limitations include lack of empirical testing of the 3 C's framework, reliance primarily on personal experience rather than research, and potential oversimplification of trust dynamics. The approach may not account for cultural differences in relationship-building or power dynamics that affect trust formation.
What this implies
Organizations may benefit from training leaders in structured relationship-building techniques, though the approach requires consistent application and cultural alignment to be effective across diverse teams
Key points
- Trust requires simultaneous demonstration of connection, character, and competence rather than relying on any single element
- Conscious questioning that reveals personal priorities, emotions, and key relationships creates meaningful professional connections
- Follow-up conversations that reference previously shared personal information demonstrate authentic care and build psychological safety
What to take away
- Use the What-Feel-Who questioning sequence to uncover what colleagues care about, their emotional state, and key relationships
- Replace generic greetings with specific follow-up questions that reference previous conversations and show genuine interest
