The Library
PERFORMANCE REVIEW

Job Performance Reviews Are Outdated and Often Pointless - FlaglerLive

unknownMay 2, 2026 4 min read
performance reviews kpis annual appraisals continuous feedback goodhart's law employee engagement performance management reform workplace metrics

Editorial summary. This is our text summary of an article published by gnews-performance-review. Charts, figures, and the author’s full voice are at the original — read it there .

Editorial verdict

Opinion-driven but research-referenced. The critique of annual performance reviews is well-supported by cited evidence, but the article's framing is advocacy-oriented — treat the directional argument as credible, the prescriptive conclusions with moderate caution.

Executive summary

This article addresses the persistent use of annual individual performance reviews despite substantial evidence of their ineffectiveness. The authors — both academics from New Zealand universities — argue that conventional performance appraisal and KPI systems are institutionally entrenched rather than genuinely effective, creating a significant disconnect between how leaders and employees perceive their utility. Key evidence includes a 2024 Betterworks survey finding that 44% of employees viewed performance management as a 'significant failure' and that employees were 57% less likely than leaders to believe it was working well, alongside a 2025 Cornell University analysis identifying institutional embeddedness and the illusion of objectivity as primary reasons outdated systems persist. The authors further draw on the well-established social science principle that when a metric becomes a target, it loses its validity as a measure. The article concludes that modern high-performance management approaches — emphasising continuous feedback, adaptable short-term objectives, and multi-source input — better reflect contemporary work realities, and that organisations should critically evaluate whether their performance metrics drive actual improvement or merely manufacture quantitative data.

opinionRelevance: 7/10Global

Key insights

  • 1A fundamental tension exists between using performance systems for pay/promotion decisions versus learning and development, and collapsing both into a single annual process undermines both objectives.
  • 2Cornell University's 2025 analysis suggests traditional performance systems persist not because they are effective but because they are institutionally embedded, perceived as objective, and costly to overhaul — with only one in five employees motivated by current systems.
  • 3The Goodhart's Law dynamic — where a metric becomes a target and ceases to be a good measure — is identified as a core failure mechanism in KPI-heavy systems, encouraging gaming, shortcuts, and misaligned behaviours rather than genuine improvement.

Practical takeaways

  • Organisations separating pay/promotion decisions from learning and development conversations may reduce the inherent tension that undermines both processes in combined annual reviews.
  • Continuous, real-time feedback mechanisms and short-term adaptable objectives are presented in the literature as more aligned with how work actually occurs, particularly where human contributions involve creativity and problem-solving rather than routine measurable tasks.

Frameworks mentioned

360-Degree Review

A multi-source feedback approach in which performance insights are gathered from multiple colleagues to provide a more balanced view of how an individual works with others, as opposed to single-source supervisor assessment.

References

  1. Betterworks (2024).2024 Survey of Performance Management.
  2. Cornell University Center for Advanced Human Resource Studies (2025).2025 Analysis of Performance Management Trends.

Source & Provenance

Verified
Publisher / Source

gnews-performance-review

Author

Not specified

Publication Date

May 2, 2026

Article Type

Opinion/Commentary

Geography

Global

Content Type
Unknown Source Type
Original Source

Original source metadata is preserved. AI analysis is generated separately.

Like this? Get the Monday Decision Brief — free, every week.

No spam, unsubscribe anytime.

Rate this article

Want the full article? Read it at the original source — free, no paywall.

Read original article
All content belongs to original publishers. AI analysis is for research purposes only. View original source.