Should we drop degree requirements and hire for skills?
Question
Should we drop degree requirements and hire for skills?
"Skills-based hiring" means removing the degree screen and selecting on what a person can actually do. The case is strong — and the shift is genuinely underway — but the evidence is just as clear that dropping a degree requirement only helps if a real skills screen takes its place. The decision isn't whether to believe in skills; it's whether you'll build the hiring to act on them.
This page is for leaders deciding whether to remove the degree screen — and what to replace it with.
Evidence
Findings from our library. The research is from developed economies (US, Canada, UK, and OECD countries) — treat it as directional for the Gulf rather than settled local fact:
Degree inflation is the problem skills-based hiring targets. Employers should use skill-based hiring to find hidden talent (Joseph Schmidt & Joshua Bourdage, The Conversation) documents "qualification inflation": in the US, of the 11.6 million jobs created between 2010 and 2016, three in four required a bachelor's degree or higher — credential screens bolted onto jobs that did not previously need them, which lock out capable candidates, lengthen recruitment, and narrow diversity.
Validated skills assessments are among the most valid ways to predict fit. The same work finds work-sample assessments "one of the most valid selection procedures," alongside structured interviews — and recommends focusing self-reports on verifiable technical skills, which candidates exaggerate less than behavioural ones.
The shift is real, not just talk. A study of ~11 million UK job postings, Skills or Degree? (Bone, Ehlinger & Stephany, arXiv), finds that for fast-growing AI roles, university-degree requirements fell 15% between 2018 and 2023 even as those postings grew 21% — and that AI skills now carry a 23% wage premium, above every degree level below a PhD. In emerging fields, demonstrable skill is out-pricing the credential.
But adoption is uneven — most employers haven't actually moved. Empowering the Workforce in a Skills-First Approach (OECD, 2025) finds large firms and the public sector leading on dropping degree requirements while smaller employers lag, and employers still varying in how far they trust skills signalled from non-traditional sources. A World Economic Forum survey cited in the report found fewer than 20% of employers had actually removed degree requirements to widen their talent pools — the say-do gap, in one number.
Disagreement
The pro case: degrees are a lazy, exclusionary proxy; validated skills assessments are fairer and more predictive — so drop the filter. The skeptic case: degrees still signal persistence and baseline capability, and removing them without a rigorous assessment just shifts bias elsewhere. The reconciliation: skills-based hiring only beats degree-based hiring if you replace the degree screen with a real, validated skills screen. Remove the degree and build the assessment — or you've just removed a signal.
Peoplense Verdict
Do — replace the degree filter with a validated skills assessment for the roles where it applies. Start with entry and mid-level, where the evidence is strongest.
Don't — announce skills-based hiring without changing your ATS filters, job descriptions, and interview rubric. Changing the posting but not the process isn't adoption — it's a label, and the data shows most employers stop there.
Watch — bias migrating. Remove degrees without a structured assessment and gut-feel takes over — the very thing skills-based hiring was meant to fix. And because access to skills-signalling is itself uneven, check who your new screen actually lets in.
What to do Monday
- Pick three roles and strip the degree requirement from the job description and the ATS knockout filter this week — then watch what happens to your pipeline.
- Build one validated skills assessment (a work sample beats interview vibes) for those roles before you change anything else.
- Audit your own funnel: what share of recent hires were non-degree? If it's near zero, your "skills-based hiring" is a label, not a practice yet.
GCC Relevance
Skills-based hiring is directly aligned with Gulf localization goals: it widens the pool of qualified nationals beyond those holding specific degrees and supports capability-building over credential-gatekeeping. Gulf hiring has historically weighted prestige degrees and pedigree heavily, so a genuine skills shift is a bigger cultural change here — and a bigger competitive edge for those who make it real. National reskilling and vocational pathways (e.g., HRDF / Hadaf programs) fit a skills-first model: employers that build real assessments can hire from those pipelines with confidence.
These Gulf points are contextual interpretation, not drawn directly from the sources above.
Sources
- Employers should use skill-based hiring to find hidden talent and address labour challenges — Joseph Schmidt & Joshua Bourdage, The Conversation (CC BY-ND), 2024
- Skills or Degree? The Rise of Skill-Based Hiring for AI and Green Jobs — Matthew Bone, Eugenia Ehlinger & Fabian Stephany, arXiv (CC BY 4.0), 2024
- Empowering the Workforce in the Context of a Skills-First Approach — OECD (CC BY 4.0), 2025
Get the Monday Brief
Evidence-based people development research, summarized weekly. Free. No ads. Every article links to its source.
Email used only to deliver the brief. Unsubscribe anytime.
Want to join the editorial team?
We're building this slowly, with HR practitioners across the GCC. If you'd like to help shape what gets published, tell us about yourself.
Tell us about yourself